United States v. Pabellon
This text of United States v. Pabellon (United States v. Pabellon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6783
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SONJI PRINCE PABELLON, a/k/a Sonji Prince,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-1169)
Submitted: July 15, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sonji Prince Pabellon, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Sonji Prince Pabellon appeals the district court’s denial of
her motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Pabellon, No. 98-CR-1169
(D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Pabellon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pabellon-ca4-2003.