United States v. Owens
This text of 653 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order denying what it properly construed as a motion for reconsideration of the district court’s previous order denying Owens’ 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court had only one opportunity to apply Amendment 782 and modify Owens’ sentence. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’? order. See United States v. Owens, No. 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-26 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
653 F. App'x 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-owens-ca4-2016.