United States v. Owens

140 F. App'x 492
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2005·No. No. 05-6353·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Owens’ motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Owens, No. CR-93-50 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 & entered Feb. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Owens, 140 F. App'x 492 (4th Cir. 2005).

140 F. App'x 492 (United States v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.