United States v. Owens
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6353
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PHILLIP ANTONIO OWENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-50)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 3, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Phillip Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Owens’ motion for a reduction in sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Owens, No. CR-93-50 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 &
entered Feb. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Owens (United States v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.