United States v. Owens

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2005·No. 05-6353·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6353

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP ANTONIO OWENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-50)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 3, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Phillip Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Owens’ motion for a reduction in sentence. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Owens, No. CR-93-50 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 &

entered Feb. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Owens, (4th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Owens (United States v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.