United States v. Outlaw

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Outlaw

467 F. App'x 161

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 22, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7435

StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 161 (United States v. Outlaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Outlaw, 467 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Alan Outlaw appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Outlaw claims that the district court erred in its reduction calculation and in denying him a hearing. We find no such error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Outlaw, No. 4:00-cr-70114-JLK-l (W.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Alan Outlaw appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Outlaw claims that the district court erred in its reduction calculation and in denying him a hearing. We find no such error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Outlaw, No. 4:00-cr-70114-JLK-l (W.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 F. App'x 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-outlaw-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack