United States v. Otero

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8362

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-7417

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-mfu-6)

Submitted: May 27, 2010 Decided: June 15, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claudio Otero, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Claudio Otero, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Otero, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-6 (W.D. Va. Sept. 15,

2008 & July 15, 2009). We deny Otero’s motion for appointment

of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED