United States v. Oscar Rodriguez-Albir

612 F. App'x 783
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2015·No. 15-40043·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Oscar Rodriguez-Albir appeals the district court’s reimposition of a $100 special assessment after the court revoked his supervised release. A review of the revocation hearing transcript reveals that the district court made no findings as to whether Rodriguez-Albir satisfied the special assessment imposed at his original sentencing and did not orally reimpose the special assessment. Thus, as the Government concedes, there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written judgment, and the oral pronouncement controls. See United States v. Martinez, 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we VACATE IN PART and REMAND for the district court to delete the reimposition of the $100 special assessment from the written judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Oscar Rodriguez-Albir, 612 F. App'x 783 (5th Cir. 2015).

612 F. App'x 783 (United States v. Oscar Rodriguez-Albir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Brown
Fifth Circuit, 2021