United States v. Oscar Roca-Alvarez and Rene Valdez

474 F.2d 1274, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11612
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 1973·No. 30554·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing filed on behalf of Appellant, Oscar Roca-Alvarez, in the above cause is hereby granted.

“In view of the doubts and ambiguities regarding the legal significance of the psychiatric testimony in this case and the resulting difficulties of retrospectively determining the petitioner’s competency” as of more than two years after trial, we reverse the judgment of conviction, “and remand the case to the District Court for a new hearing to ascertain petitioner’s present competency to stand trial, and for a new trial if petitioner is found competent.” Dusky v. United States, 1960, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Oscar Roca-Alvarez and Rene Valdez, 474 F.2d 1274, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11612 (5th Cir. 1973).

474 F.2d 1274 (United States v. Oscar Roca-Alvarez and Rene Valdez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related