United States v. Ortiz

420 U.S. 905, 95 S. Ct. 822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ortiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 422 U.S. 891
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 27, 1975·No. No. 73-2050; No. 73-6848·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 419 U. S. 824.] Motion of the Solicitor General to consolidate cases for oral argument granted and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument. Motion for appointment of new counsel in No. 73-2050 granted. It is ordered that Charles M. Sevilla, Esquire, of San Diego, Cal., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case, and John J. Cleary, Esquire, is hereby relieved of his prior appointment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ortiz, 420 U.S. 905, 95 S. Ct. 822 (1975).

420 U.S. 905 (United States v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.