United States v. Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 6, 2006·No. 05-7961·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLOS ORTIZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-301-S; CA-05-2793-WDQ-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying without prejudice his motion filed under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the denial

by the United States District Court for the Western District of

Virginia of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Ortiz, Nos. CR-92-301-S; CA-05-2793-

WDQ-1 (D. Md. Nov. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ortiz, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Ortiz (United States v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241