United States v. Ortiz
This text of United States v. Ortiz (United States v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7961
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CARLOS ORTIZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-301-S; CA-05-2793-WDQ-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying without prejudice his motion filed under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the denial
by the United States District Court for the Western District of
Virginia of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Ortiz, Nos. CR-92-301-S; CA-05-2793-
WDQ-1 (D. Md. Nov. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ortiz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ortiz-ca4-2006.