United States v. O'Neil

249 F. App'x 497
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2007·No. No. 06-50499·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Timothy Eugene O’Neil appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed for two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not clearly err in imposing a two-level enhancement for threat of death pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F). O’Neil’s written statement, “I have a gun,” was sufficient to instill a fear of death in a reasonable victim and there were no unusual circum[498] stances to mitigate the phrase. See United States v. Jennings, 439 F.3d 604, 611 (9th Cir.2006).

In regards to O’Neil’s challenges to the reasonableness of his sentence, we conclude that the district court applied the appropriate legal standard and properly considered the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. Given the record, we cannot say that O’Neil’s sentence was unreasonable. See United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2913, 165 L.Ed.2d 931 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. O'Neil, 249 F. App'x 497 (9th Cir. 2007).

249 F. App'x 497 (United States v. O'Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Wooten
689 F.3d 570 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)