United States v. O'Neil

Fourth Circuit

United States v. O'Neil

616 F. App'x 69

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2015·No. No. 15-7098·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rita Marshal O’neil appeals the district court’s order granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. O’neil, No. 4:10-cr-00203-TLW-7 (D.S.C. June 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rita Marshal O’neil appeals the district court’s order granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. O’neil, No. 4:10-cr-00203-TLW-7 (D.S.C. June 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. O'Neil, 616 F. App'x 69 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

616 F. App'x 69 (United States v. O'Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related