United States v. O'Neil

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 31, 2011
• Docket: 10-7694
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7694

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES EDWARD O’NEIL, a/k/a Charles Edward Oneil, Jr., a/k/a Worm,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00047-RLV-5)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward O’Neil, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward O’Neil appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart,

595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order for the reasons stated there. See United

States v. O’Neil, No. 5:00-cr-00047-RLV-5 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED