United States v. One De Soto Sedan, 1946 Model, Etc., Robert Lee Smith, Jr.
This text of 180 F.2d 583 (United States v. One De Soto Sedan, 1946 Model, Etc., Robert Lee Smith, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case cannot be distinguished from Coffey v. United States, 116 U.S. 436, 6 S.Ct. 437, 29 L.Ed. 684; and the judgment below will be affirmed on the authority of that decision. 85 F.Supp. 245. It is argued that subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court have weakened the authority of the Coffey case; but that case has never been overruled. On the contrary, in one of the cases chiefly relied upon by the United States, the Supreme Court was at pains to distinguish it. See Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 58 S.Ct. 630, 82 L.Ed. 917.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 F.2d 583, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-one-de-soto-sedan-1946-model-etc-robert-lee-smith-jr-ca4-1950.