United States v. One De Soto Sedan, 1946 Model, Etc., Robert Lee Smith, Jr.

180 F.2d 583, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2467
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 1950·No. 6028_1·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case cannot be distinguished from Coffey v. United States, 116 U.S. 436, 6 S.Ct. 437, 29 L.Ed. 684; and the judgment below will be affirmed on the authority of that decision. 85 F.Supp. 245. It is argued that subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court have weakened the authority of the Coffey case; but that case has never been overruled. On the contrary, in one of the cases chiefly relied upon by the United States, the Supreme Court was at pains to distinguish it. See Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 58 S.Ct. 630, 82 L.Ed. 917.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. One De Soto Sedan, 1946 Model, Etc., Robert Lee Smith, Jr., 180 F.2d 583, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2467 (4th Cir. 1950).

180 F.2d 583 (United States v. One De Soto Sedan, 1946 Model, Etc., Robert Lee Smith, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doles v. State
2007 WY 119 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2007)
Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts
451 S.W.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1969)
United States v. Howell F. Burch
294 F.2d 1 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. One 1957 Model Oldsmobile "88" 4-Door Sedan
157 F. Supp. 835 (E.D. North Carolina, 1957)
Inman v. United States
151 F. Supp. 784 (W.D. South Carolina, 1957)
No. 6965
222 F.2d 668 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
United States v. One 1953 Oldsmobile 98 4 Door Sedan
222 F.2d 668 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
Henry Grady Snead v. United States
217 F.2d 912 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Gramer
191 F.2d 741 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
United States v. 38 Cases, Containing Figlia Mia Brand
99 F. Supp. 460 (S.D. New York, 1951)