United States v. Omar Herman Bacca-Beltran, United States of America v. Robert Chemaly

764 F.2d 747, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30801
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1985
Docket83-5065
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 764 F.2d 747 (United States v. Omar Herman Bacca-Beltran, United States of America v. Robert Chemaly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Omar Herman Bacca-Beltran, United States of America v. Robert Chemaly, 764 F.2d 747, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30801 (11th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

764 F.2d 747

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Omar Herman BACCA-BELTRAN, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert CHEMALY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 82-6161, 83-5065.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

June 6, 1985.

Theodore Sakowitz, Federal Public Defender, Gary S. Pont, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Donna R. Rougeux, Miami, Fla., for O.H. Bacca-Beltran.

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Linda Collins Hertz, Lawrence H. Sharf, David O. Leiwant, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Rosen & Rosen, P.A., Lawrence N. Rosen, Miami, Fla., for R. Chemaly.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Sidney M. Aronovitz and Donald J. Porter, Judges.

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION

(Opinion September 20, 1984, 11th Cir., 1984, 741 F.2d 1361).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

On the Court's own motion, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

It is ORDERED that the order entered December 18, 1984 granting a rehearing en banc in these appeals is hereby VACATED. The opinions of the panel in these causes filed September 20, 1984 are hereby REINSTATED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Melvin Alvin Cox
281 F. App'x 943 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Johnny L. Holmes
270 F. App'x 767 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Alfonso Hidalgo
7 F.3d 1566 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Oswald G. Blake, Leonard Eason
888 F.2d 795 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Ramon Milian-Rodriguez
828 F.2d 679 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Demurgas
656 F. Supp. 1537 (E.D. New York, 1987)
United States v. Benevento
649 F. Supp. 1379 (S.D. New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 F.2d 747, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-omar-herman-bacca-beltran-united-states-of-america-v-ca11-1985.