United States v. Bacca-Beltran
764 F.2d 747
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1985
DocketNos. 82-6161, 83-5065
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 764 F.2d 747 (United States v. Bacca-Beltran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Bacca-Beltran, 764 F.2d 747 (11th Cir. 1985).
Opinion
On the Court’s own motion, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,
It is ORDERED that the order entered December 18, 1984 granting a rehearing en banc in these appeals is hereby VACATED. The opinions of the panel in these causes filed September 20, 1984 are hereby REINSTATED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Misael Rodriguez Perez
Eleventh Circuit, 2020
United States v. Ezeiruaku
754 F. Supp. 420 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)
John T. Tukes v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections
911 F.2d 508 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Luis Enrique Gonzalez
875 F.2d 875 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Turner
639 F. Supp. 982 (E.D. New York, 1986)
United States v. Omar Herman Bacca-Beltran, United States of America v. Robert Chemaly
764 F.2d 747 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
764 F.2d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bacca-beltran-ca11-1985.