United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores

409 F. App'x 808

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2011·No. 09-50474·Unpublished

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM: *

In light of the Supreme Court’s judgment vacating and remanding this case, we hereby vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, — U.S. ---, 130 S.Ct. 2577, 177 L.Ed.2d 68 (2010). The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM: *

In light of the Supreme Court’s judgment vacating and remanding this case, we hereby vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, — U.S. ---, 130 S.Ct. 2577, 177 L.Ed.2d 68 (2010). The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores, 409 F. App'x 808 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

409 F. App'x 808 (United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related