United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores

365 F. App'x 582
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 2010
Docket09-50474
StatusUnpublished

This text of 365 F. App'x 582 (United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Omar Carrizosa-Flores, 365 F. App'x 582 (5th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Omar Carrizosa-Flores presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 335-36 (5th Cir.2008), which held that even after Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), a second state conviction for simple possession of a controlled substance qualifies as an aggravated felony that supports the imposition of an eight-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopez v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. Cepeda-Rios
530 F.3d 333 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 F. App'x 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-omar-carrizosa-flores-ca5-2010.