United States v. Olvis

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 1, 2008
• Docket: 08-7160
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7160

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY L. OLVIS, a/k/a Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v.

Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under

§ 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”);

United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000).

Thus, we affirm the district court’s orders for the reasons

stated therein. See United States v. Olvis, No. 4:95-cr-00038-

RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2008; filed Apr. 29, 2008 & entered May

2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED