United States v. Oliver

623 F. App'x 125
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7156
StatusPublished

This text of 623 F. App'x 125 (United States v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Oliver, 623 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Troy Oliver appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Application of Amendment 782 to Oliver does not have the effect of lowering his Guidelines sentence. Accordingly, he is not entitled to a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). The district court thus did not reversibly err in denying Oliver’s motion, and we affirm its order. United States v. Oliver, No. 5:12-cr-00808-MBS-8 (D.S.C. July 1, [126]*1262015). We dispense with’ oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oliver-ca4-2015.