United States v. Oiler
Opinion
Dorothy Ann Oiler appeals the district court’s order denying her request for re-sentencing, but granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Oiler, No. 5:06-cr-00098-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 7, 2008). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
294 F. App'x 32 (United States v. Oiler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.