United States v. Odom

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6792

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HIAWATHO ODOM, JR., a/k/a Hiawatha Bines, Jr., a/k/a Peanut Odom,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00070-RLV-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hiawatho Odom, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hiawatho Odom, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction

in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Odom, No. 5:99-cr-00070-RLV-1

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED