United States v. Ochoa-Oropeza

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 28, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51169 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL OCHOA-OROPEZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-272-4 --------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Daniel Ochoa-Oropeza has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ochoa-Oropeza has not filed a response.

Our review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.