United States v. Ochoa-Oropeza
Opinion
Counsel for Daniel Ochoa-Oropeza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ochoa-Oropeza has not filed a response. Our review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, [643]*643and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
139 F. App'x 642 (United States v. Ochoa-Oropeza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.