United States v. Norwood

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Norwood

17 C.M.A. 289, 17 USCMA 289, 38 C.M.R. 87, 1967 CMA LEXIS 216, 1967 WL 4381

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 1967

DocketNo. 20,445

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 C.M.A. 289 (United States v. Norwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Norwood, 17 C.M.A. 289, 17 USCMA 289, 38 C.M.R. 87, 1967 CMA LEXIS 216, 1967 WL 4381 (cma 1967).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

FeRguson, Judge:

In this case, a bad-conduct discharge became a permissible additional punishment only because of the fact that the offenses of which accused was convicted permitted confinement for six months or more. See Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 127c, section B. The failure of the president so to instruct the court-martial was prejudicial error. United States v Yocom, 17 USCMA 270, 38 CMR 68, this day decided.

The decision of the hoard of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence or order a rehearing thereon.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI