United States v. Norwood
71 M.J. 167, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 235
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 29, 2012
DocketNo. 11-0515/MC
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 71 M.J. 167 (United States v. Norwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Norwood, 71 M.J. 167, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 235 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 201000495. Review granted on the following issues:
WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011), THE SPECIFICATIONS ALLEGING ATTEMPTED ADULTERY AND CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE STATE OFFENSES.
WHETHER, IN ORDER TO STATE AN OFFENSE OF ATTEMPT OR CONSPIRACY UNDER ARTICLES 80 AND 81, THE SPECIFICATION IS REQUIRED TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EACH ELEMENT OF THE PREDICATE OFFENSE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Pursuant to Military Rule of Evidence 412(c)(2), the Clerk is directed to seal pages 67 to 85 of the record of trial and Appellate Exhibits VIII and DC.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Norwood
71 M.J. 204 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 167, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-norwood-armfor-2012.