United States v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc.

25 F. Supp. 2d 690, 1998 WL 765648
CourtDistrict Court, D. Maryland
DecidedSeptember 14, 1998
DocketCiv.A. AW 98-3113
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 F. Supp. 2d 690 (United States v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc., 25 F. Supp. 2d 690, 1998 WL 765648 (D. Md. 1998).

Opinion

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

The United States of America and the Defendants, named herein, have consented to the entry of the foregoing preliminary injunction, subject to the approval of this Honorable Court:

A.PARTIES

1. The Parties to this Preliminary Injunction are: Plaintiff, United States of America and Defendants Northern Health Facilities, Inc., d/b/a Greenbelt Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Extendicare Health Services, Extendicare Holdings, Inc., Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., Northern Health Facilities, Inc., Extendicare Health Facilities Holdings, Inc. All Defendants are hereinafter referred to collectively as Greenbelt Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (“Greenbelt”).

B.JURISDICTION AND VENUE

2. The United States and Greenbelt stipulate and agree that this Honorable Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 31 U.S.C.A. § 3729; and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65; venue lies in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(b) and (c); and, the parties will be bound by the terms of this Preliminary Injunction under the terms set forth herein and as otherwise modified by the Court.

C.SUMMARY OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND

3. The United States is currently investigating allegations of federal law violations in connection with health care services rendered to nursing home residents at Greenbelt. The allegations involve the systemic denial of care, including but not limited to: *691 medical care, misuse of psychotropic and anti-depressant medication, systemic failure to provide minimal standards of care guaranteed by law, and the submission of false claims to obtain payment from the United States to which Greenbelt is not entitled. The investigation is ongoing. On or about September 14,1998, the United States filed a Complaint for Injunctive Relief, seeking preliminary injunctive relief pending the investigation to ensure that during the investigation the residents received all necessary and appropriate care guaranteed by law.

4. The United States and Greenbelt agree to the terms of the Preliminary Injunction as set forth herein (sometimes hereinafter referred to as Order or Consent Order).

D. GENERAL PROVISIONS

5. In entering into this Preliminary Injunction voluntarily and by consent, Greenbelt does not admit to any violation of law and the Parties agree that this Order may not be used as evidence of liability in any other proceeding, including any trial on the merits of this pending action. Greenbelt further preserves and does not waive any legal defense to the allegations asserted in this action and disputes the factual allegations.

6. During the duration of this action and under the terms of this Preliminary Injunction, all federal and State regulatory oversight and enforcement obligations shall remain in full effect. All administrative remedies, including the authority of the Office of Inspector General to seek exclusion and the Health Care Financing Administration and the State of Maryland to seek termination or other administrative remedies, are preserved and are not supplanted by the terms of the Preliminary Injunction, except as modified by agreement of the Parties or this Court.

7. This Preliminary Injunction is legally binding and judicially enforceable by the Parties and it shall be applicable to and binding upon all of the parties, their officers, agents, employees, assigns, and successors. All reports, verifications and notices required to be submitted to the Parties by this Order shall be made directly to the United States Attorney’s Office and the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health & Human Services and counsel for Greenbelt.

E. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW

8. In the operation and management of Greenbelt and in providing services to Greenbelt’s residents, Greenbelt shall comply fully with the particular provisions of the Nursing Home Reform Act and other relevant provisions as embodied in Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq. and Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq. all regulations and guidelines promulgated pursuant to these statutes and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., including, but not limited to 42 C.F.R. Part 483, Subparts B, C, D, and E, § 483.1 through § 483.206. The Parties agree that the language in 42 C.F.R. § 483.1 through § 483.206 is incorporated by reference into this Preliminary Injunction and that the provisions of this Preliminary Injunction are to be construed consistent therewith. Greenbelt shall also comply fully with the particular provisions of the Greenbelt’s protocols and the plans of correction submitted to the State of Maryland in connection with survey actions and administrative actions pursued from January 1998 to present and shall submit within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order verification that the plans of correction are implemented. Greenbelt agrees that its obligation to .comply fully with its protocols and plans of correction does not limit its obligation to comply fully with federal law or with the provisions of this Order.

9. Greenbelt’s submission of plans of correction and/or certifications of compliance by the Health Care Financing Administration does not in and of itself constitute compliance with this Preliminary Injunction, nor does a cited deficiency by state or federal surveyors establish noncompliance with this Preliminary Injunction. Findings of the Monitor provided under this Order do not, in and of themselves, constitute deficiencies by federal or State surveyors.

10. If Greenbelt seeks to add a policy, procedure or protocol which addresses resi *692 dent care issues or to modify a policy, or procedure or protocol which has been attached to and incorporated into this Consent Order, Greenbelt shall first submit any proposed new or modified policy, procedure or protocol to the United States and the Monitor as defined in paragraph 44-48(u) for review. In the event that any administrative agency takes any action requiring a response or plan of correction, Greenbelt’s response and any subsequent plan of correction shall proceed pursuant to administrative requirements without prejudice or delay.

11. The United States or the Monitor may provide Greenbelt with comments or recommendations regarding the proposed new or modified protocol within ten (10) days of receipt of the proposed modification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brogdon Ex Rel. Cline v. National Healthcare Corp.
103 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (N.D. Georgia, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Supp. 2d 690, 1998 WL 765648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-northern-health-facilities-inc-mdd-1998.