United States v. Norford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7787

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANE BRUNELL NORFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00039-H-2)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dane Brunell Norford, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dane Brunell Norford appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Norford, No. 4:02-cr-00039-H-2 (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2009). We

further deny Norford’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED