United States v. Noggin

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Noggin

326 F. App'x 703

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2009·No. No. 08-7924·Published

Opinion

[704]*704Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Leon Noggin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Noggin, No. 3:03-cr-00237-JRS (E.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2008) (noting that Noggin could not benefit from Amendments 706 and 711 because he was a career offender). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[704]*704Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Leon Noggin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Noggin, No. 3:03-cr-00237-JRS (E.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2008) (noting that Noggin could not benefit from Amendments 706 and 711 because he was a career offender). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Noggin, 326 F. App'x 703 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 703 (United States v. Noggin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related