United States v. Noggin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 2009
Docket08-7924
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Noggin (United States v. Noggin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Noggin, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7924

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY LEON NOGGIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00237-JRS)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 22, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Leon Noggin, Appellant Pro Se. Oliva N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy Leon Noggin appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Noggin, No. 3:03-

cr-00237-JRS (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2008) (noting that Noggin could

not benefit from Amendments 706 and 711 because he was a career

offender). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Noggin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-noggin-ca4-2009.