United States v. Noggin
This text of United States v. Noggin (United States v. Noggin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7924
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY LEON NOGGIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00237-JRS)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 22, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Leon Noggin, Appellant Pro Se. Oliva N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Timothy Leon Noggin appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Noggin, No. 3:03-
cr-00237-JRS (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2008) (noting that Noggin could
not benefit from Amendments 706 and 711 because he was a career
offender). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Noggin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-noggin-ca4-2009.