United States v. Noble

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Noble. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 645
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2009·No. 09-6084·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6084

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GERALD NOBLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA-5)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 28, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gerald Noble appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Noble, No.

3:95-cr-00488-JFA-5 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Noble, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Noble (United States v. Noble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related