United States v. Nijjar
This text of 332 F. App'x 378 (United States v. Nijjar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Surinder Singh Nijjar appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for making false statements to a government agency, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Nijjar contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(ll) (2002) because it improperly relied on certain testimony, and because the government’s evidence failed to demonstrate that the offense involved a conscious or reckless risk of serious bodily injury or death. We conclude that the district court did not err. See United, States v. Johansson, 249 F.3d 848, 859-60 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nijjar-ca9-2009.