United States v. Nieves
This text of 653 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Nieves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jose Antonio Nieves appeals the district court’s order denying Nieves’ motion to reconsider the court’s prior order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. As the district court was without authority to reconsider its ruling on Nieves’ § 3582(c)(2) motion, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
653 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nieves-ca4-2016.