United States v. Nichols

550 F. App'x 161
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7235
StatusPublished

This text of 550 F. App'x 161 (United States v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nichols, 550 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richy Orlando Nichols appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nichols, No. 1:04-cr-00424-1 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 2013). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 F. App'x 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nichols-ca4-2014.