United States v. Newton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Newton. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 F. App'x 64
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2008·No. 08-6672·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6672

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JESSIE WILLIAM NEWTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-SGW-18)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessie William Newton, Appellant Pro Se. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jessie William Newton appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) motion.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Newton, No. 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-18 (W.D. Va.

Mar. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Newton, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Newton (United States v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related