United States v. Newell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Newell

341 F. App'x 903

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2009·No. No. 09-6862·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Newell appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Newell, No. 1:00-cr-00146-AMD-4 (D.Md. Apr. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[904]*904tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Newell appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Newell, No. 1:00-cr-00146-AMD-4 (D.Md. Apr. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[904]*904tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Newell, 341 F. App'x 903 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

341 F. App'x 903 (United States v. Newell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related