United States v. Nelson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2000·No. 00-6561·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALBERT SHAW NELSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-95-333)

Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Albert Shaw Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. CR-95-333 (D.S.C.

Mar. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nelson, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Nelson (United States v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.