United States v. Nelson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6967
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLEVELAND NELSON, a/k/a Cleve, a/k/a Fat Daddy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-94-57-H, CA-97-578-H)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Cleveland Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Nelson, Nos. CR-94-57-H;
CA-97-578-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Nelson (United States v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.