United States v. Neil Rene

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 2018
Docket17-11456
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Neil Rene (United States v. Neil Rene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Neil Rene, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-11456 Document: 00514642847 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-11456 FILED Summary Calendar September 14, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

NEIL NICK RENE,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 4:12-CR-95-3

Before SMITH, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Neil Rene, federal prisoner #26589-077, pleaded guilty of conspiracy to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-11456 Document: 00514642847 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2018

No. 17-11456

possess with intent to distribute 50 kilograms or more of marihuana and con- spiracy to launder monetary instruments. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 151 months. He appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction in sentence.

The motion for reconsideration was filed more than 14 days after the ruling on the § 3582(c)(2) motion. The district court therefore lacked jurisdic- tion to act on the motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Miramontez, 995 F.2d 56, 58 n.2 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cook, 670 F.2d 46, 48 (5th Cir. 1982); see also United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994) (affirming the denial of an unauthorized postjudgment motion because the dis- trict court lacked jurisdiction). Accordingly, the order denying reconsideration is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William R. Cook
670 F.2d 46 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Eusebio Miramontez, Jr.
995 F.2d 56 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Darrell Early
27 F.3d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Neil Rene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-neil-rene-ca5-2018.