United States v. Nedeltcho Vladimirov

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 2025
Docket25-6230
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Nedeltcho Vladimirov (United States v. Nedeltcho Vladimirov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nedeltcho Vladimirov, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6230 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6230

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NEDELTCHO VLADIMIROV,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (2:20-cr-00054-1)

Submitted: June 17, 2025 Decided: June 23, 2025

Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nedeltcho Vladimirov, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6230 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/23/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Nedeltcho Vladimirov appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a

sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record

and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Vladimirov’s

motion. See United States v. Centeno-Morales, 90 F.4th 274, 280 (4th Cir. 2024)

(explaining that a district court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, irrationally,

does not follow statutory or judicially recognized requirements, or commits an error of law

or fact). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Vladimirov,

No. 2:20-cr-00054-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 2025). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Angel Centeno-Morales
90 F.4th 274 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Nedeltcho Vladimirov, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nedeltcho-vladimirov-ca4-2025.