United States v. Nava

151 F. App'x 533
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2005·No. No. 04-50463·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Martinez Nava appeals the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 [534] (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ame-line’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nava, 151 F. App'x 533 (9th Cir. 2005).

151 F. App'x 533 (United States v. Nava) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Isidro Moreno-Hernandez
419 F.3d 906 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)