United States v. Nation
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 04-30015 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KINDAL L. NATION, also known as Bag; TIMOTHY NATION, also known as Black,
Defendants-Appellants.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-30043-2 and No. 02-CR-30043-8 --------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Kindal L. Nation and Timothy
Nation in this direct criminal appeal has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Timothy Nation has filed a
motion for appointment of substitute counsel in response to
counsel’s Anders brief. Kindal L. Nation has not filed a
response.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-30015 -2-
Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief
shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Timothy Nation’s
motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Nation (United States v. Nation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.