United States v. Nation

136 F. App'x 679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 2005
Docket04-30631
StatusUnpublished

This text of 136 F. App'x 679 (United States v. Nation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nation, 136 F. App'x 679 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Kerry Nation appeals the district court’s denial of a post-conviction motion to dis *680 miss a multi-count indictment charging numerous defendants as being part of a crack cocaine distribution ring run by the Nation family. The district court concluded that the motion should be treated as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and that it could not entertain the motion because all the movants had pending appeals. Only Kerry Nation signed the notice of appeal, and the notice does not name the individual appellants. Rather, the notice says that defendants, “Lee Dell Nation, et al.” appeal the denial of the district court’s order.

We need not reach any jurisdictional or procedural issues raised by the Government, because we conclude that the appeal is frivolous. See United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Weathersby, 958 F.2d 65, 66 (5th Cir.1992). The contention on appeal that the indictment is defective because it does not allege specific intent and does not specify the mixture containing cocaine base is patently without merit. The indictment plainly states that the defendants intentionally conspired and agreed to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base. This is sufficient to allege specific intent, see United States v. Purvis, 580 F.2d 853, 857-58 (5th Cir.1978), and to put defendants on notice of the offense with which they were charged. United States v. Gaytan, 74 F.3d 545, 551 (5th Cir.1996). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gaytan
74 F.3d 545 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Alvarez
210 F.3d 309 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Thomas J. Purvis
580 F.2d 853 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Walter Weathersby
958 F.2d 65 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 F. App'x 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nation-ca5-2005.