United States v. Nathan Silla

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 27, 2013
• Docket: 13-6776
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6776

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NATHAN A. SILLA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cr-00157-AW-1)

Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan A. Silla, Appellant Pro Se. Christen Anne Sproule, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathan A. Silla appeals the district court’s order

denying his post-judgment motion for the preparation of various

transcripts at Government expense. On appeal, we confine our

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Silla’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Silla

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED