United States v. Natasha Wallace

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2024
Docket24-6184
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Natasha Wallace (United States v. Natasha Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Natasha Wallace, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6184 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NATASHA L. WALLACE, a/k/a Natasha Wallace,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cr-00030-JPJ-PMS-13)

Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 4, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Natasha L. Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Patrick Jones, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6184 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/04/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Natasha L. Wallace appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part A of Amendment 821 to the

Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. See

United States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district

court’s judgment. United States v. Wallace, No. 1:21-cr-00030-JPJ-PMS-13 (W.D. Va.

entered Feb. 15, 2024 & filed Feb. 16, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Guy Spruhan
989 F.3d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Natasha Wallace, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-natasha-wallace-ca4-2024.