United States v. Nantz

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 2003
Docket02-40292
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Nantz (United States v. Nantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Nantz, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40292 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD WAYNE NANTZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of USDC No. 1:91-CR-56-ALL -------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Wayne Nantz (“Nantz”), federal inmate #03324-078,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

motion to modify his sentence. Nantz argues that Amendment 484,

which modified the application note in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, entitled

him to a reduction in his sentence. Amendment 484 is

inapplicable because Nantz was sentenced based on the amount of

methamphetamine that he was capable of producing, given the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40292 -2-

amount of materials seized at the time of his arrest. See

United States v. Allison, 63 F.3d 350, 352-53 (5th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Elmer Dean Allison
63 F.3d 350 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Nantz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nantz-ca5-2003.