United States v. Nantz
This text of United States v. Nantz (United States v. Nantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40292 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONALD WAYNE NANTZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of USDC No. 1:91-CR-56-ALL -------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donald Wayne Nantz (“Nantz”), federal inmate #03324-078,
appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
motion to modify his sentence. Nantz argues that Amendment 484,
which modified the application note in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, entitled
him to a reduction in his sentence. Amendment 484 is
inapplicable because Nantz was sentenced based on the amount of
methamphetamine that he was capable of producing, given the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40292 -2-
amount of materials seized at the time of his arrest. See
United States v. Allison, 63 F.3d 350, 352-53 (5th Cir. 1995).
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Nantz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nantz-ca5-2003.