United States v. Murray

558 F. App'x 331
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2014·No. No. 13-7778·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Lloyd Murray appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Murray, 558 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2014).

558 F. App'x 331 (United States v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)