United States v. Murray

1 F. App'x 142
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 2001
Docket00-6655
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1 F. App'x 142 (United States v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Murray, 1 F. App'x 142 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Williams Wise Murray appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court may not modify a sentence under § 3582 once it has been imposed except in very narrow circumstances not applicable here. The district court therefore did not have jurisdiction to consider Murray’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We deny as moot Murray’s motions for summary reversal and bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *143 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. App'x 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-murray-ca4-2001.