United States v. Murphy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Murphy. Read the opinion of the Court — 552 F.3d 405
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 31, 2009·No. 09-7813·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7813

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY LAFON MURPHY, a/k/a TJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cr-00241-FL-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lafon Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy Lafon Murphy appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murphy,

No. 5:04-cr-00241-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Murphy, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Murphy (United States v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related