United States v. Muhammad

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 3, 2009
• Docket: 08-8176
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8176

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MUJADDID RAHIM MUHAMMAD, f/k/a Stacey Lamar Marsh,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:91-cr-00114-2)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion to reduce his sentence filed pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and the order denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:91-cr-

00114-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 2008; Sept. 24, 2008); see United

States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009), petition for

cert. filed, 77 U.S.L.W. 3559 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2009) (No.

08-1185). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED